The suit for permanent injunction regarding trademark infringement and passing off was decreed in terms of a settlement agreement reached through mediation. The agreed destruction of seized infringing goods was noted, and parties to bear own costs.
Suit decreed in terms of the Settlement Agreement; costs to parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
PUMA SE & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Manav Kumar, Adv.
Versus
CAPITAL SPORTS PVT LTD & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar and Ms. Bhavana Dukoon, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
O R D E R
% 13.07.2016
by the authorised representative of the defendant No.1 and of the other defendants as well as by the counsels for the parties and the Mediator has been received.
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.
JULY 13, 2016 bs..
Page 2 of 2
CS(COMM) 58/2015
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
