Court allowed parties' compromise application in a suit. The extinguished order decreed the suit based on the terms of the compromise and accepted the defendants' undertakings.
Application for compromise allowed; suit decreed in terms of compromise; undertakings accepted; defendants bound.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~26
MADHU VIJAYAN ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Julien George and Mr. Ranjeet Singh Sidhu, Advs.
Versus
DEEPAN SIVARAMAN & ANR ..... Defendants Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
O R D E R
% 23.11.2016 IA No.14503/2016 (of parties u/O 23 R-3 CPC)
self and as attorney of defendant No.2 Mr. K. Raghunadhan as well as by the counsel for the plaintiff and is also supported by the affidavits of the attorney of the plaintiff and the defendant No.1 Mr. Deepan Sivaraman.
Copy of this order be given dasti under the signatures of the Court Master.
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.
NOVEMBER 23, 2016 bs..
Page 2 of 2
CS(COMM) 1467/2016
Deepan Sivaraman
K. Raghunadhan
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
