Ravi Kant Sharma v. State & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Revision petition challenging anticipatory bail granted to accused in a case involving alleged cheque bouncing and property dispute. This Court examined if the ASJ erred in law or made an error of jurisdiction while granting bail, finding the order was legal and no interference warranted.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~60
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CRL.REV.P. 77/2016
RAVI KANT SHARMA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Narender Sharma, Advocate
versus
STATE & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms.Alpana Pandey, APP for the State with SI Anand Kumar, PS Mehrauli
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI
O R D E R % 01.02.2016
Crl. M.A.1767/2016
- Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
- Application stands disposed of.
CRL.REV.P. 77/2016
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail granted by the ASJ warrants interference under revisional jurisdiction.
Whether the ASJ failed to apply the correct legal grounds for granting bail as established by Supreme Court precedents.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ravi Kant Sharma
- respondent
State
Coram
Pratibha Rani
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court