Allowed

Anita Suri v. Aseem Sethi & Anr.

Delhi HC14 Sept 2016CRL.REV.P./607/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the revision petition allowing the compromise in a cheque bounce case. The petitioner deposited the compensation amount and obtained the respondent's consent to settle. The offence was permitted to be compounded, leading to the petitioner's acquittal and release of deposited funds to the respondent with interest.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner acquitted; offence permitted to be compounded; deposited amount with interest released to respondent no.1 by Registry.

Anita Suri Vs Aseem Sethi & Anr. — Cheque Dishonour | Delhi HC (2016)

¶1

$~36

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

CRL.REV.P. 607/2014 ANITA SURI ..... Petitioner Through : Petitioner in person. versus ASEEM SETHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through : Mr. Vineet Chadha, Adv. for R-1 with R-1 in person. Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK O R D E R % 14.09.2016

¶4

Petitioner was convicted by trial court under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 vide judgment dated 25^th March, 2013 and sentenced to undergo SI for six months and to pay compensation of `2,50,000/- to the complainant (respondent no.1), in default of payment of compensation to undergo SI for two months.

¶5

Petitioner filed Crl.A.No.38/2013 before the Additional Sessions Judge01 (West), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, which has been disposed of vide judgment dated 16^th September, 2014, which is under challenge in this revision petition filed by petitioner. Appellate court has affirmed the conviction of appellant under Section 138 of the Act but has reduced the substantive sentence of six months to three months. So far as quantum of compensation is concerned,

¶6

same has been maintained as it is.

¶7

Vide order dated 26^th September, 2014, petitioner was admitted to bail subject to her depositing compensation/fine of 2,50,000/- with the Registrar General of this Court and furnishing personal bond in the sum of 20,000/with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of Registrar General.

¶8

It is submitted that petitioner has already deposited `2,50,000/- in this Court which fact is supported from the office noting dated 14^th October, 2014. Amount is lying in the FDR. Petitioner submits that she is willing to settle the matter with the respondent no.1 and offers the amount deposited by her together with interest accrued thereon to respondent no.1 towards full and final settlement for all his claims arising under the cheque in question. Respondent no.1 is present in Court along with his counsel and submits that this offer is acceptable to him and he is willing to compound the matter on receipt of this amount. Accordingly, offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act is permitted to be compounded. Petitioner is acquitted. Amount lying deposited in this Court together with interest accrued thereon be released to respondent no.1 by the Registry, forthwith.

¶9

Petition is disposed of in the above terms.

¶10

Dasti.

¶11

A.K. PATHAK, J.

¶12

SEPTEMBER 14, 2016/ dk

Anita Suri v. Aseem Sethi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anita Suri v. Aseem Sethi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Birjesh Tarun Vs State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Pankaj Kumar Jha & Ors.

Shivraj Gupta Vs Deshraj Gupta & Ors.

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs Gayatri & Ors.

Deepak @ Vicky Vs State ( Gnct Delhi)

Vikas Aggarwal Vs Shir Bal Krishna Gupta & Ors.