Dismissed
Urmil Bajaj v. Sudhir Nayar
Delhi HCCRL.REV.P./555/2006
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~24
URMIL BAJAJ ..... Petitioner Through: Proxy counsel (appearance not given). versus
SUDHIR NAYAR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. V.S. Chauhan, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI
O R D E R % 04.02.2016
PRATIBHA RANI, J.
FEBRUARY 04, 2016/ ‘aky’
Despite many passovers, neither the main counsel nor the proxy counsel for the petitioner appeared. The proxy counsel when appeared at the first call informed that the main counsel has the instructions from the petitioner to withdraw this revision petition.
Since has appeared on behalf of the petitioner despite many Passovers, the revision petition is dismissed in default as well as for nonprosecution.
PRATIBHA RANI, J.
FEBRUARY 04, 2016
‘aky’
Urmil Bajaj
Sudhir Nayar
Pratibha Rani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court