Ravinder v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
In this writ petition, the petitioner sought relief regarding a pending parole application. The Supreme Court of India has ruled that the High Court of Delhi should dispose of the parole application within seven days.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition is disposed of, directing the competent authority to decide the pending parole application within seven working days.
What the court decided
$~28
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(CRL) 347/2016 RAVINDER ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Mohd. Faraz, Advocate versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Ms.Kamna Vohra, ASC (Crl.) SI Sunil Kumar, P.S. Narela
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
O R D E R % 03.02.2016
Mr. Rahul Mehra, learned Standing Counsel (Criminal) appearing on behalf of the official respondent, on advance notice, fairly states that the application for parole dated 10th November, 2015 filed on behalf of the petitioner herein, which is pending consideration before the competent authority, shall be disposed of in accordance with law within a period of seven working days from today, under intimation to the petitioner.
Ordered accordingly.
The present writ petition is disposed of accordingly whilst reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach this Court afresh in the event he is aggrieved by the order passed by the competent authority on his application for parole.
Dasti.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be disposed of by directing the competent authority to decide the pending parole application within seven days.
What relief, if any, should be granted by the High Court to the petitioner in his writ petition regarding the parole application.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
RAVINDER
- respondent
STATE
Coram
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court