Sant Lal v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The Delhi High Court allowed a bail petition for parole to enable the petitioner to file a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court. The rejected order by the State was quashed subject to conditions including furnishing a bond and surrendering upon period expiry.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner directed to be released on parole for four weeks subject to specified conditions, including furnishing a bond and reporting to police regularly.
What the court decided
$~6.
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(CRL) 2895/2016
SANT LAL
| .... | . Petiti | oner | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Through: | Mr. Dinesh Singh, Adv. |
Malik and | Gur | preet | |
| versus | |||||
| STATE | ..... R | espon | dent | ||
| Through: | Mr. Sanjay | Lao, ASC | with | Mr. | |
| Siddarth Sin |
dhu, Adv. |
with | SI |
||
| Sanjeev Lehri, | PS SJ Encla | ve |
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI
O R D E R % 07.12.2016
The petitioner has preferred the present petition to seek a direction that he be released on parole for a period of one month to be able to prefer a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court. The petitioner stands convicted for the offence under Section 302/201 IPC in case FIR 120/2012 registered at PS Safdarjung Enclave. His criminal appeal was dismissed by this court on 09.05.2016. The nominal roll shows that the petitioner has undergone 4 year and 4 months as on 15.09.2016. His jail conduct is found to be satisfactory. The permanent address provided by the petitioner has been got verified.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be granted parole for one month to file a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court.
Whether the order passed by the State rejecting the petitioner's parole application should be quashed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SANT LAL
- respondent
STATE
Coram
VIPIN SANGHI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court