Petitioner filed writ petition for production of his daughter. Daughter produced herself, stated she married respondent 2 freely, is major and pregnant. Alleged threats dismissed. Daughter desires to reside with husband. Petition not pressed and dismissed as such.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
WAHID ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. N. S. Dalal, Mr. D. P. Singh and Ms. Ruchika Sharma, Advocates. versus
THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR..... Respondent Through : Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Mr. Amrit Singh and Mr. Shekhar Budakoti, Advocates. SI Pawan, PS – Harsh Vihar. Mr. Sarfaraz Husain, Adv. for R-3.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL
O R D E R % 01.02.2016
Mr. Dalal, Advocate for the petitioner submits that the present petition has been filed by the petitioner for production of his daughter. Ms. Heena was produced in court. She has informed the court that she has married one Suhel Khan, respondent no. 2 out of her own free will. She also stated that she is a major and she is on family way which fact was ascertained by the parties. Allegations with regard to threats being made by both parties, both parties agree that they will not threaten each other and maintain cordial relations. In view of the fact that Hina is continuously reiterating her statement that she wishes to reside with her husband, the writ petition is not pressed by the petitioner. The same is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties shall remain bound by the statements made in Court today.
G.S.SISTANI, J
SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J
FEBRUARY 01, 2016/ sc
Wahid
The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
G.S. Sistani
Sangita Dhingra Sehgal
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
