Single judge order listing the petitioner's request for time to receive reply affidavit and file rejoinder while renaming the matter to be heard afresh after a specific date.
Copy of reply affidavit supplied within two days; rejoinder permitted within four weeks thereafter; case renamed for 16.03.2017; interim order continued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~6
..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. M. Hassibddin, Adv.
versus
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR
..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP with ACP/DIU R.S. Adhikari. Mr. Prabhat Kumar, Adv. for R-2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R % 05.12.2016
Reply affidavit has been filed by respondent No.2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has not received a copy thereof. Copy of the reply affidavit be supplied within two days. Rejoinder in four weeks thereafter.
Renotify on 16th March, 2017.
Interim order to continue.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
DECEMBER 05, 2016 ‘ga’
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, who has not received a copy of the reply affidavit, is entitled to time for filing rejoinder.
Ashutosh Verma
The State (NCT of Delhi)
Anr
Mukta Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
