Yad Ram @ Phattu v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge order dismissing an application for parole to file a Special Leave Petition lacking justification due to a prior dismissal on identical grounds.
What did the court decide?
Parole was denied; petitioner was permitted to file Special Leave Petition from jail through legal aid.
What the court decided
$~9
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(CRL) 2275/2016
YAD RAM @ PHATTU ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Mohammad Faraz, Adv.
versus
STATE ..... Respondent Through :Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel with Mr. Jamal Akhtar, Adv. and SI Ombir Singh, P.S. Welcome
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK O R D E R % 07.11.2016
Petitioner has prayed for grant of parole for three months for filing Special Leave Petition. It is noted that petitioner had earlier filed WP (Crl.) No. 638/2016 seeking parole for three months on the ground of filing Special Leave Petition. The said writ petition was dismissed by a Bench of coordinate jurisdiction vide order dated 15th March, 2016. I do not find any justification to entertain another writ petition for seeking the same relief. Petitioner is at liberty to file Special Leave Petition from jail through the legal aid.
Petition is dismissed.
A.K. PATHAK, J.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant parole to the petitioner for a special purpose as prayed in the writ petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
YAD RAM @ PHATTU
- respondent
STATE
Coram
A.K. Pathak
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court