Allowed

Attar Singh & Ors. v. State ( Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Delhi HC19 Sept 2016CRL.M.C./1455/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Delhi quashed FIR Nos. 345/2009 under various IPC sections upon the finding that the dispute between petitioners and complainant had been amicably settled. Petitioners were ordered to deposit costs with the PM NRLF.

What did the court decide?

FIR No. 345/2009 under Sections 323/341/452/506/34 IPC registered at PS New Ashok Nagar and all proceedings therefrom quashed. Petitioners directed to deposit Rs. 15,000 with PM NRLF.

Attar Singh & Ors. Vs State ( Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr. — Quashing and FIR | Delhi HC (2016)

¶1

$~3

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

CRL.M.C. 1455/2016

¶4

ATTAR SINGH & ORS

¶5

..... Petitioners

¶6

Through : Mr.S.N.Qureshi, Advocate.

¶7

versus

¶8

STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR

¶9

..... Respondents

¶10

Through : Mr.Kamak Kr.Ghei, APP. Mr.Deepak Sharma, Advocate for the Complainant along with complainant present in person. SI Pinki Rana, PS New Ashok Nagar.

¶11

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

¶12

O R D E R % 19.09.2016

¶13

(1) Present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioners for quashing of FIR No.345/2009 under Sections 323/341/452/506/34 IPC registered at Police Station New Ashok Nagar. It is stated that the matter has been settled with the complainant/respondent No.2 amicably.

¶14

(2) Respondent No.2-complainant is present before the Court along with his counsel. The Investigating Officer present in the court has identified him. I have enquired from the complainant whether the CRL.M.C. 1455/2016 Page 1 of 2

¶15

matter has been settled with the petitioners amicably without fear and pressure. He has informed that the matter has been settled without any fear or pressure and he has no objection to the quashing of the FIR.

¶16

(3) The petition is supported by the affidavits of the parties.

¶17

(4) Since the complainant/Respondent No.2 has voluntarily settled the dispute with the petitioners, no useful purpose will be served to continue with the proceedings. Both the parties reside in the same vicinity. In the interest of justice and to put an end to the litigation and to enable the parties to maintain their neighbourly relations, FIR No.345/2009 under Sections 323/341/452/506/34 IPC registered at Police Station New Ashok Nagar and all the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

¶18

(5) The petitioners are, however, burdened with costs of `15,000/to be deposited with Prime Minister National Relief Fund within two weeks. The Registry shall ensure the compliance of the order.

¶19

(6) The petition is disposed of accordingly.

¶20

S.P.GARG, J.

¶21

SEPTEMBER 19, 2016/ sa

¶22

CRL.M.C. 1455/2016

¶23

Page 2 of 2

Attar Singh & Ors. v. State ( Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Attar Singh & Ors. v. State ( Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sudhir Kumar Vs the State (Nct of Delhi)

Satbeer Singh Vs the State ( Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Santosh Kumar & Anr. Vs State & Anr.

Mayank Gupta & Ors. Vs the State ( NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Mansi Bansal Vs State ( NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Deepika Vs Raja Ram Singh Rana & Anr.