Allowed

Rajesh Kumar v. the State ( NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

Delhi HC1 Apr 2016CRL.M.C./1270/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail petition, the High Court of Delhi quashed FIR No. 108/2014 under Section 354 IPC. The court relied on the fact that the dispute was settled amicably without coercion, allowing the petitioner to escape criminal liability in the interest of justice.

What did the court decide?

FIR No. 108/2014 under Section 354 IPC and all proceedings arising therefrom are quashed.

Rajesh Kumar Vs the State ( NCT of Delhi) & Ors. — Quashing and FIR | Delhi HC (2016)

¶1

$~27

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 1270/2016

¶4

RAJESH KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Ashok Tobria & Mr. R.K. Misra, Advocates

¶5

versus

¶6

THE STATE ( NCT OF DEL	HI) &	ORS	..... Responde	nts
Through	Mr. SI	Tarang Kishan	Srivastava, APP. Gopal, Police St	ation
	Pala	m Villa	ge.
	Mr.	S.Y.	Usmani, Advocate	for
	resp	ondent	Nos. 2 & 3 along	with
	resp	ondent	Nos. 2 & 3.

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

¶8

O R D E R % 01.04.2016

¶9

Crl. MA No. 5464/2016 (Exemption)

¶10

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶11

Application stands disposed of.

¶12

CRL.M.C. 1270/2016

¶13

Present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.108/2014 under Section 354 IPC at Police Station Palam Village, New Delhi. It is stated that the matter has been settled CRL.M.C. 1270/2016 page 1 of 2

¶14

amicably with the complainants/victims/respondent Nos. 2 and 3 vide settlement deed dated 29.02.2016.

¶15

Complainants/victims/respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are present with their counsel and have been identified by the Investigating Officer. I have enquired from them if they have settled the dispute with the petitioner amicably without any fear or pressure. They have informed that all the disputes between the parties have been resolved amicably with their free consent and they have no objection to the quashing of the FIR in question.

¶16

The petition is supported by affidavits of the parties. Copy of settlement agreement dated 29.02.2016 has been placed on record. Since the dispute between the parties has been settled, no useful purpose will be served to continue with the proceedings. In the interest of justice and to enable the parties to put an end to the litigation, FIR No. 108/2014 under Section 354 IPC at Police Station Palam Village, New Delhi and all the proceedings arising therefrom are quashed.

¶17

The petitioner is directed to deposit `20,000/- as costs in the Prime Minister Relief Fund within two weeks. Registry shall ensure its compliance.

¶18

The petition stands disposed of accordingly.

S.P.GARG, J

APRIL 01, 2016

CRL.M.C. 1270/2016

page 2 of 2

Rajesh Kumar v. the State ( NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajesh Kumar v. the State ( NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Salma Vs State

Vivek Tyagi & Ors. Vs the State ( NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

Vaibhav Dawar & Ors. Vs State ( NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Vijay Kumar Yadav Vs State

Abdul Ghafoor Vs State ( the NCT of Delhi)

Naveen Jindal Vs State of Delhi