A special petition under Section 482 CrPC sought directions for expedited trial. The High Court found settlement attempts had failed and the matter was fixed for final arguments on charge. No further direction was deemed necessary.
No further direction regarding expedited trial was granted; matter disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~7
AJIT SINGH MAKER ..... Petitioner Represented by: Ms. Rebeca M. John, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Vishal Gosain, Adv.
versus
STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT O R D E R % 07.04.2016
“Keeping in view the averments made in the instant petition and submissions of learned counsel for petitioner, this Court expects from learned trial court to decide the case expeditiously.
“Matter today is fixed for arguments on charge and appearance of accused; however, it is informed by the ld. Counsel for the parties that with the intervention of friends and relatives, both parties being brothers are trying to explore possibilities of settlement in all 4-5 case pending between them. It is informed that there was all possibility that the entire dispute might be settled. A long date is hence prayed.”
“It is submitted by Proxy Counsel for accused that settlement talks inter-se are still going on and some more time was required for finalization of the modalities.”
SURESH KAIT, J
APRIL 07, 2016 jg
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the trial court should be directed to expedite the trial in the underlying criminal case.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
AJIT SINGH MAKER
STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) & ANR
SURESH KAIT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
