Deepak Nanda v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
In this writ petition, the Delhi High Court granted the petitioner parole for a period of four weeks specifically to file a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court, relying on Government guidelines, subject to specific reporting and conduct conditions.
What did the court decide?
Parole granted for four weeks to file SLP in Supreme Court; personal bond of Rs.10,000 with one surety imposed; reporting and conduct conditions specified.
What the court decided
$~19
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(CRL) 1204/2016 DEEPAK NANDA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.S.B.Dandapani, Advocate. versus
STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Rahul Mehra, St. Counsel for the State with Insp.Satyavir, PS Binda Pur.
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI
O R D E R % 13.05.2016
- The present writ petition has been filed by the Petitioner from Jail praying for grant of parole for the purpose of filing SLP and re-establishing social ties.
- Status report has been filed by the State verifying the address of the Petitioner to be correct.
- Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner had made representation to the Respondent/State praying for grant of parole which has been rejected by the Respondent vide order No.F.18/516/2015/HG/964 dated 23.02.2016.
- Learned counsel for the Petitioner further submits that in terms of Parole/Furlough Guidelines-2010 issued by the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi, it is open to the Government to consider the applications for grant of parole inter alia on various grounds which also includes the ground of filing of a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court of India against a judgment delivered by the High Court convicting or upholding the conviction, as the case may be. He further submits that in the W.P.(CRL) 1204/2016 Page 1 of 3
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is eligible to be granted parole to file a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court under the Parole/Furlough Guidelines-2010.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Deepak Nanda
- respondent
State
Coram
Pratibha Rani
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court