Quashed

Naresh Kumar v. the State (N.C.T. of Delhi) & Anr.

Delhi HC18 Jul 2016CRL.M.C./1085/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court quashed an FIR alleging assault and criminal intimidation registered against the petitioner after the complainant stated that the matter had been amicably settled. The court emphasized that continuing proceedings would serve no useful purpose and would only create acrimony given the voluntary settlement.

What did the court decide?

FIR No. 1391/2014 and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed.

Naresh Kumar Vs the State (N.C.T. of Delhi) & Anr. — Cheating and Forgery | Delhi HC (2016)

¶1

$~8

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 1085/2016

¶4

NARESH KUMAR ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Santosh Kumar Suman, Adv.

¶5

versus

¶6

THE STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP with WASI Krishnan, PS Tilak Nagar. Mr. C. Prakash, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

¶8

O R D E R % 18.07.2016

¶9

Crl.M.A. 4651/2016

¶10

Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 1085/2016

¶11

By the present petition, the Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No. 1391/2014 under Sections 323/354B/506 IPC registered at PS Tilak Nagar, Delhi on the complaint of Respondent No.2.

¶12

Learned counsel for the State on instructions from Investigating Officer states that besides the Petitioner there is no other accused involved in the FIR and besides Respondent No. 2 there is no other complainant/victim.

¶13

CRL.M.C. 1085/2016

¶14

page 1 of 2

¶15

Respondent No. 2 is present in Court and is identified by her counsel and the Investigating Officer. She states that she has settled the matter with the Petitioner and in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties, she do not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.

¶16

In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question.

¶17

Consequently, FIR No. 1391/2014 under Sections 323/354B/506 IPC registered at PS Tilak Nagar, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed.

¶18

Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court.

¶19

The petition is disposed of. Order dasti.

¶20

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

¶21

JULY 18, 2016 ‘ga’

¶22

page 2 of 2

¶23

CRL.M.C. 1085/2016

Naresh Kumar v. the State (N.C.T. of Delhi) & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Naresh Kumar v. the State (N.C.T. of Delhi) & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deepak Kumar @ Deepu Yadav @ Bhupender Kumar Vs State

Kamal Bhardwaj Thr. His Father/Parokar Satish Kumar Vs the State ( NCT of Delhi) and Another

Rashid Ali Vs the State through Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Jaipal Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Vineet Kumar Diwakar Vs the State & Anr.

Saurabh Maria Vs State & Anr.