A High Court of Delhi order where the petitioner sought to withdraw contempt proceedings with liberty to challenge a connected order. The petition was disposed of with rights and contentions left open.
Contempt petition disposed of upon withdrawal with liberty to challenge the order dated 14.9.2016.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
#1
$~
SANDEEP KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Udyan Srivastava, Advocate versus RAJIV MEHRISHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC with Mr. Debjyoti Behuria, Ms. Priyansha Sinha, Ms. Shivangi Sinha and Ms. Manisha Saroha, Advocates with Mr. S.S. Sejwal, Law Officer, CRPF.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
O R D E R % 02.11.2016
Today in Court, learned counsel for respondents has handed over a copy of the order dated 14th September, 2016 whereby the petitioner’s representation with regard to reduction of punishment has been disposed of. The same is taken on record.
Learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present contempt proceedings with liberty to challenge the order dated 14th September, 2016.
With the aforesaid liberty, present contempt petition stands disposed of. Rights and contentions of all parties are left open.
NOVEMBER 02, 2016 rn
MANMOHAN, J
Sandeep Kumar
Rajiv Mehrishi & Ors.
Manmohan
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
