This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AM UL YA
With
+ CONT.CAS(C) 831/2016 & C.M.Nos.24304-24305/2016
| JAGDESHKUMAR | Petitioner |
|---|---|
| Thi'ough versus |
Mr.KirtiUppal,Sr.Advocatewith Mr.SatishKumarTripathiandMr.Amit Dubey,Advocates. |
| NARESHKUMAR& ORS |
Respondents |
| Through | Mr.SriEiarshaPeechara,ASCwith Mr.MananjayKumarMishra,Advocate forNDMC. |
With
+ CONT.CAS(C) 832/2016 & C.M.Nos.24306-24307/2016
| MOEE)MUZA | EdD | Petitioner |
|---|---|---|
| Thi'ough versus |
Mr.KirtiUppal,Sr.Advocatewith Mr.SatishKumarTripathiandMr.Amit Dubey,Advocates. |
|
| NARESHKU | MAR& ORS Thi'ough |
Respondents Mr.SriHarshaPeechara,ASCwith Mr.MananjayKumarMishra,Advocate forNDMC. |
With
CONT.CAS(C) 833/2016 & C.M.Nos.24308-24309/2016
| SHANKARLAL | Petitioner | |
|---|---|---|
| Through versus |
Mr.KirtiUppal,Sr.Advocatewith Mr.SatishKumarTripathiandMr.Amit Dubey,Advocates. |
|
| NARESHKUMA | R&ORS Through |
Respondents Mr.SriHarshaPeechara,ASCwith Mi-.MananjayKumarMishi-a,Advocate forNDMC. |
With
+ CONT.CAS(C) 834/2016 & C.M.Nos.24310-24311/2016
| RAMNIWAS | Petitioner | |
|---|---|---|
| Thi'ough versus |
Mr.KirtiUppal,Sr.Advocatewith Mr.SatishKumarTripathiandMr.Amit Dubey,Advocates. |
|
| NARESHKUM | AR& ORS |
Respondents |
| Through | Mr.SriHarshaPeechara,ASCwith Mr.MananjayKumarMishiu,Advocate forNDMC. |
And
BINADEVI Petitioner Through Mr.Kirti Uppal, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Satish Kumar Tripathi and Mr.Amit Dubey, Advocates.
versus
NARESH KUMAR & ORS Respondents Through Mr.Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC with Mi'.Mananjay Kumar Mishra, Advocate forNDMC.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
ORDER % 13.07.2016
Present contempt petitions have been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the undertaking given before this Court on 22"^^ June, 2016 in Contempt Case No.819/2016.
After some arguments, Mr. Kriti Uppal, learned senior counsel for the petitioners candidly admits that no violation of the order dated 22"''
June, 2016 is made out.
Consequently, the present contempt petitions are dismissed. In the event, if contempt of any of other order is made out, the petitioners are at liberty to file appropriate proceedings in accordance with law. This Court, however, clarifies that it has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the proposed case. Rights and contentions of all parties are left open.
u MANMOHAN, J
JULY 13, 2016 KA
JAGDESHKUMAR
MOEE)MUZA EdD
SHANKARLAL
RAMNIWAS
BINADEVI
NARESHKUMAR & ORS
MANMOHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
