This is a short order wherein the two-judge Bench disposed of Cont. Cas(C) 819/2015 by declining to continue the petition based on a prior order in WP(C) 4409/2015.
The contempt petition could not be further continued and stands disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
IQBAL CHAUHAN ..... Petitioner
Through : Mr A.K. Mishra with Mr Amit Kumar Pandey
versus
C UDAY KUMAR
..... Respondent Through : Ms Anju Gupta with Mr R.L. Goel for SDMC. ASI Raj Kumar, P.S. Safdarjung Enclave Mr Rajiv Bansal with Ms Niharika Ahluwalia and Ms Pragya Wazir for DDA.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
%
O R D E R 20.07.2016
In view of the order passed in WP(C) 4409/2015, we are not inclined to continue
this contempt petition any further.
The same stands disposed of.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J
JULY 20, 2016 SR
ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition should be continued in light of a prior order (WP(C) 4409/2015).
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
WP(C) 4409/2015Dissented from¶12
IQBAL CHAUHAN
C UDAY KUMAR
BADAR DURREZ AHMED
ASHUTOSH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
BADAR DURREZ AHMED and ASHUTOSH KUMAR
Parties & counsel
