Manish Gupta v. Sanjay Saxena & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner's bail petition was disposed of as not pressed due to a separate bail order dated 02.11.2016. No substantive legal reasoning is provided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~29
versus
SANJAY SAXENA & ANR ..... Respondents Through : Mr. Vivek Sood, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sameer Nandawani and Mr. Siddharth Gupta, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK O R D E R % 02.11.2016
In view of the order passed in bail application nos.526/2016 &
794/2016, present petition is not being pressed and disposed of as not
pressed.
A.K. PATHAK, J.
NOVEMBER 02, 2016/ dk
1 provisions across 1 enactments
MANISH GUPTA
SANJAY SAXENA & ANR
A.K. PATHAK
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court