Petitioner sought to withdraw contempt petition and application with liberty to file a fresh writ. Court dismissed withdrawn applications and allowed the petition subject to exceptions.
Petition allowed subject to just exceptions; contempt petition and application dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh writ.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~15
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
AKBAR JAMAL ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Niraj Chaudhary, Advocate
versus
P K GUPTA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Umang Mittal proxy for Mr. Vikas Chopra, Advocate for NDMC Mr. Vinod Kumar Bhati proxy for Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC for respondent No.3 Mr. Ashok Chhabra and Ms. Simran Kaur, Advocates for intervener
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
O R D E R % 23.02.2016
C.M. Appl. 19241/2015
Allowed, subject to just exceptions.
C.M. Appl. 6614/2016
The delay in re-filing is condoned. Application is disposed of. CONT.CAS(C) 717/2015 and C.M. Appl. 6613/2016
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition and the application with liberty to file a fresh writ petition.
The contempt petition and the application are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
J.R. MIDHA, J.
FEBRUARY 23, 2016/rsk
AKBAR JAMAL
P K GUPTA & ORS
J.R. MIDHA
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
