A contempt petition filed by Shashtri Yadav was dismissed as withdrawn after counsel submitted instructions from the personally present petitioner.
Contempt petition and applications dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~6
Through Mr.Chandra Shekhar Biswas, Advocate.
versus
ANIL KUMAR GUPTA & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr.Ajjay Aroraa with Mr.Kapil Dutta and Ms.Diksha Lal, Advocates for MCD. Mr.Ajay Verma, Sr.Standing Counsel for DDA. Mr.Mohit Chaudhary, Advocate for R- 10 to 15. ASI Jai Singh, PS I. Puri.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
O R D E R % 16.11.2016
Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions of the petitioner who is personally present in Court, wishes to withdraw the present contempt petition.
It is pertinent to mention that in the status report filed by North DMC, it is stated that in none of the properties mentioned by the petitioner, any construction activity is in progress. It is further stated that some of the properties mentioned by the petitioner were booked but as they are protected under the National Capital Territory of Delhi Laws (Special Provisions) Second (Amendment) Act, 2014, no demolition action can be taken till 31st December, 2017.
Consequently, the present contempt petition and the applications are dismissed as withdrawn.
MANMOHAN, J
NOVEMBER 16, 2016 KA
Shashtri Yadav
Anil Kumar Gupta & Ors.
Manmohan
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
