Counsel for the petitioner was permitted to withdraw the petition without prejudice to merits before the Company Law Board. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn with a recital that merits were not examined.
Counsel permitted to withdraw petition without prejudice to merits pending before Company Law Board.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~53
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr.Saurabh Gupta
Versus
EXPLORER TRAVERLS AND TOURS PVT. LTD. & ORS.
..... Respondents Through: Mr.Vivek Malik and Mr.Mukul Thakur Advs. Mr.Rakesh Khanna and Mr. Sanjeev Saraswat, Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA O R D E R % 27.07.2016
Counsel for petitioner states that he has instruction to withdraw the petition without prejudice to the merits of the matter pending before the Company Law Board. He is permitted to do so.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
It is made clear that merits of the matter have not been examined one way or the other.
SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J
JULY 27, 2016 mr
PUNITA KHATTER
EXPLORER TRAVERLS AND TOURS PVT. LTD.
SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
