The court dismissed petitions against M/S M-Tech Developers Ltd. for non-prosecution after the respondent discharged obligations under a settlement dated 02.02.2015 and paid the agreed amounts.
The captioned petitions and pending applications are dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~11 & 12
HEMA AGGARWAL ..... Petitioner
Through: None
versus
M/S M-TECH DEVELOPERS LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aayushi Gupta for Mr. Raman Duggal, Advocate
ASHOK KUMAR BHARTI ..... Petitioner
Through: None
versus
M/S M-TECH DEVELOPERS LTD ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aayushi Gupta for Mr. Raman Duggal, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER O R D E R
% 12.01.2016
A perusal of the record shows that on 03.02.2015, the court had recorded that a settlement had been arrived at between the parties in respect of the captioned matters, which is dated 02.02.2015. CO.PET. 785/2014 & 787/2014 page 1 of 2
Ms. Gupta, who appears for the respondent, says that the respondent has discharged its obligations under the settlement and paid the amounts to the petitioners in each of the captioned matters.
It is also the submission of the learned counsel for the respondent that the petitioners were, consequently, obliged to withdraw the captioned petitions.
There is no appearance on behalf of the petitioners. It appears that since a settlement has been arrived at between the parties and, the amounts payable under it, have been received, the petitioners are no longer interested in pursuing the captioned petitions.
Accordingly, the captioned petitions and the pending applications are dismissed for non-prosecution.
The Registry will, however, despatch a copy of this order to the aforementioned petitioners, without insistence on process fee.
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
At this stage, Mr. Rakesh K. Goswami, Advocate appeared for the petitioners. He has been apprised of the order passed today.
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
JANUARY 12, 2016 yg
CO.PET. 785/2014 & 787/2014
page 2 of 2
Hema Aggarwal
Ashok Kumar Bharti
M/S M-Tech Developers Ltd.
Rajiv Shakdher
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
