Petitioner bank sought to withdraw an application due to lack of territorial jurisdiction. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with liberty to approach the appropriate forum.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~13
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Udbhav Kumar Jain, Adv.
versus
APEX ENCON PROJECTS PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr T.V.L.N. Rao & Mr Anurag Jain, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER O R D E R % 14.03.2016
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition as he says that the petitioner has now discovered that the registered office of the respondent does not lie within the territorial jurisdiction of this court, with liberty though, to approach the appropriate forum.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for, albeit, in accordance with law.
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
MARCH 14, 2016 kk
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD.
APEX ENCON PROJECTS PVT. LTD.
RAJIV SHAKDHER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
