Disposed

White Fox Support Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Lambda Eastern Telcommiunication Limited

Delhi HC3 Aug 2016CO.PET./340/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of the petition following an amicable settlement between parties. Respondent undertook to pay Rs.1,25,000/- plus costs via cheques, which were accepted pending encashment.

What did the court decide?

Petition and pending applications disposed of on settlement terms where respondent agreed to pay Rs.1,25,000/-. Cheques accepted subject to encashment.

White Fox Support Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Delhi HC (2016)

¶1

$~16

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CO.PET. 340/2014 & CA No.1246/2014

¶4

WHITE FOX SUPPORT SERVICES PVT LTD ..... Petitioner

¶5

Through Mr. Hemant Sharma and Mr. Palash Aggarwal, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

LAMBDA EASTERN TELCOMMIUNICATION LIMITED

¶8

..... Respondent

¶9

Through Mr. Kunjan Arora, Director.

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA

¶11

O R D E R % 03.08.2016

¶12

Mr. Kunjan Arora, Director of the respondent company, is present in person.

¶13

Both Mr. Arora and counsel for the petitioner state that the matter has been amicably settled with the respondent undertaking to pay a sum of Rs.1,25,000/- in full and final settlement of all the claims of the petitioner company, which are the subject matter of the instant proceedings, including all costs, interest etc. Towards this, Mr. Arora has handed over a cheque bearing No.000576 for a sum of Rs.1,25,000/-, dated 11.08.2016, drawn on HDFC Bank, to counsel for the petitioner who has accepted the same subject to its encashment. Mr. Arora further undertakes to this Court that the said cheque will be encashed on presentation, and to ensure that sufficient funds

¶14

are maintained in the relevant account at all times during the period of validity of the cheque.

¶15

Mr. Arora has also handed over another cheque of Rs.11,000/towards costs imposed on 26.03.2015. He states that the said cheque is also good for payment, and will be duly encashed on presentation during the period of its validity.

¶16

Mr. Arora’s undertakings to this Court are accepted by this Court, and he shall remain bound by the same. Consequences of the breach of the undertakings have also been explained to him.

¶17

Counsel for the petitioner states that under the circumstances, he does not wish to press this matter any further whilst reserving the right to file any fresh petition, and also to initiate proceedings in contempt, as his client may be advised in case of any breach. He is permitted to do so.

¶18

Consequently, and as prayed, the petition and all pending applications stand disposed off in terms of the aforesaid settlement.

¶19

SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J

¶20

AUGUST 03, 2016\ dr

White Fox Support Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Lambda Eastern Telcommiunication Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

White Fox Support Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Lambda Eastern Telcommiunication Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunil Kumar Singh Vs Assotech Limited

Samara India Advisors Private Limited Vs Guardian Lifecare Private Limited

Linen Advertising & Communications Pvt.Ltd. Vs Big Shoe Bazaar India Pvt.Ltd.

In the Matter of Atm Credit and Investments Private Limited Vs

Rastogi Enterprises Private Limited & Ors. Vs the Registrar of Companies

In the Matter of Panshil Electro Private Limited Vs