Order dismissing a civil suit for non-prosecution, noting that the petitioner was not interested in pursuing the matter despite prior directions to the respondent.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~20
M/S NEDLLOYD LOGISTICS INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner
Through: None
versus
M/S OLIVE TELECOMMUNICATION PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through; Mr. Abhimanyu Lall, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER O R D E R % 26.02.2016
The learned counsel for the respondent says that settlement has been arrived at between the parties. There is, however, no representation on behalf of the petitioner. The position was no different on the previous two dates, i.e. 19.08.2015 and 22.09.2015.
I may only note that on 19.08.2015, this court had directed the respondent to file settlement documents on record. Notwithstanding the aforesaid directions, since the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the petition, the same is dismissed for non-prosecution.
A copy of this order will despatched by the Registry to the petitioner.
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
FEBRUARY 26, 2016 yg
M/S NEDLLOYD LOGISTICS INDIA PVT. LTD.
M/S OLIVE TELECOMMUNICATION PVT. LTD.
RAJIV SHAKDHER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
