Petition rendered infructuous as auction of suit property took place on 18.9.2015. Petitioner's filing of objections made no difference. Order disposed accordingly without substantive proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~32
MOHD ARIFEEN (SINCE DECEASED) REPRESENTED BY HIS LRS.
..... Petitioner
Through Mr.Rajinder Mathur, Adv.
versus
VIJAY KUMAR GUPTA
..... Respondent Through Mr.Puneet Taneja, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the respondent points out that the auction has taken place of the suit property on 18.9.2015. This position is admitted.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has filed objections to the objections proceedings.
This petition i.e. the order dated 18.5.2015 has now become infructuous. It is disposed of accordingly.
Order dasti under signatures of the Court Master.
INDERMEET KAUR, J
JANUARY 12, 2016 ndn
Mohd Arifeen represented by his LRs
Vijay Kumar Gupta
Indermeet Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
