Single judge order dismissing a challenge to attachment warrants on the ground that the property belonged to the deceased husband who sold it during his lifetime.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~69
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
O R D E R % 18.01.2016
The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 23.11.2015 vide which the warrants of attachment had been ordered against the petitioner/legal heirs of deceased JD returnable for 18.01.2016. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the property in question i.e. property being No. WZ-36, Basai Dara Pur, New Delhi belonged to the JD and it was during his own lifetime i.e. in the year 2005 that he had sold this property. Admittedly as per the petitioner/legal heirs of deceased JD No. 4, the petitioner had no interest in this property i.e. property being No. WZ-36, Basai Dara Pur, New Delhi which as per her averments both written and orally submitted before this Court has been sold by the husband during his life time. If that be the position, why the petitioner is aggrieved by the issuance of warrants of attachment is not clear to the Court.
This petition is without any merit. Dismissed.
INDERMEET KAUR, J
JANUARY 18, 2016 A
Rajesh Saini
Daya NAND
Indermeet Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
