This order remarks that IX Rule 13 of the CPC is clear and that the impugned order to which objection had been taken suffers from no infirmity.
The objection to the interim order was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~26
..... Petitioner
Through Mr.Qayumu-ud-din, Advocate.
versus
M/S GEMINI INTERNATIONAL
..... Respondent Through Nemo.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR O R D E R % 04.03.2016 C.M. Nos.8095-97/2016 CM(M) 206/2016
Under IX Rule 13 of the CPC is itself clear. Impugned order suffers from no infirmity. Dismissed.
INDERMEET KAUR, J
MARCH 04, 2016 ndn
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned order suffers from any infirmity under the provisions of IX Rule 13 of the CPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajesh Taneja
M/S Gemini International
Indermeet Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
