Petitioner aggrieved by user charge fixation in tenant suit. Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach Trial Court.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to approach Trial Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~25
..... Petitioner
versus
SUBODH KUMAR GUPTA
..... Respondent
Through None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
O R D E R % 17.02.2016 C.M. No.5723/2016 & C.M. No.5724/2016 (exemption)
Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Application disposed of.
CM(M) 159/2016
The petitioner is aggrieved by a part of the order dated 14.09.2015 wherein user charges had been fixed qua the tenant at the rate of Rs.9,000/- per month (hence forth); submission being that the user charges should have been from the date of the institution of the suit.
This petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to move Trial Court and to make appropriate submissions which have been urged before this Court.
INDERMEET KAUR, J
FEBRUARY 17, 2016 A
Sharda Manaktala
Subodh Kumar Gupta
Indermeet Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
