Saimi Sattar v. Abhigyan Hans
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Delhi disposed of a petition where parties had settled disputes via an agreement dated 1st February, 2016, executed before the Mediation Centre.
What the court decided
$~3
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CM(M) 140/2012 SAIMI SATTAR ..... Petitioner Through :Mr. Sunil Kumar, Adv. with petitioner in person.
versus
ABHIGYAN HANS ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Sunil Mittal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK
O R D E R % 04.03.2016
Parties have settled their disputes before Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre on 1st February, 2016 on the terms and conditions as stipulated in the Settlement Agreement, which has been signed by the parties, their counsels and the learned Mediator. Settlement Agreement is marked as “Mark C-1”. Impugned order is modified in terms of “Mark C-1”. Parties shall remain bound by the terms of “Mark C-1”. Petition is disposed of.
A.K. PATHAK, J.
MARCH 04, 2016 rb
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Saimi Sattar
- respondent
Abhigyan Hans
Coram
A.K. Pathak
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court