The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the bail application, which was granted. Consequently, the bail application stands dismissed as withdrawn. The order is a routine procedural disposition with no substantive legal proposition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
9# $~
RINKU @ SUNITA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Shashi Shankar and Ms. Pooja Mohnani, Advocates. versus
STATE, GOVT OF NCT DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State with Inspector Anil Kumar, SHO, Sun Light Colony, Inspector Om Prakash Lekhwali and SI Megha Ram.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R % 21.07.2016
After some arguments learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition.
Leave granted.
Bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
JULY 21, 2016
‘vn’
RINKU @ SUNITA
STATE, GOVT OF NCT DELHI
MUKTA GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
