Allowed

Krishna Kumar Sharma v. State (Nct of Delhi)

Delhi HC19 Apr 2016BAIL APPLN./566/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court admitted the petitioner to bail in a cheating case under IPC Sections 376/506. Considering the petitioner's offer to pay Rs 4 lacs without prejudice and subject to future adjustment, bail was granted upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs 50,000 with one surety.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner admitted to bail on personal bond of Rs 50,000 with one surety; directed to pay Rs 4 lacs to complainant within two weeks.

Krishna Kumar Sharma Vs State (Nct of Delhi) — Cheating and Forgery | Delhi HC (2016)

¶1

$~18

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- BAIL APPLN. 566/2016

¶4

KRISHNA KUMAR SHARMA ..... Petitioner

¶5

Through : Mr.Anurag Jain, Advocate.

¶6

versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Amit Gupta, APP with SI Mithlesh Yadav. Mr.Naveen K.Sharma, Advocate for the complainant.

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG O R D E R

¶8

% 19.04.2016

¶9

The petitioner seeks regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in case FIR No.69/2016 registered under Sections 376/506 IPC at PS Mukherjee Nagar. Status report is on record.

¶10

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties including the counsel for the complainant. During the course of arguments, on instructions, petitioner’s counsel offered to pay ` 4 lacs to the complainant without prejudice and subject to future adjustment (if any).

¶11

The petitioner is in custody since 13.01.2016. Upon completion of investigation, a charge-sheet has already been filed. The complainant had alleged to have been cheated of ` 3 lacs by the BAIL APPLN. 566/2016 page 1 of 2

¶12

page 1 of 2

¶13

petitioner. Offer has been made on behalf of the petitioner voluntarily to pay 4 lacs to the complainant without prejudice and subject to future adjustment (if any). The parties were acquainted with each other since long. Physical relations took place between the two several times albeit on the alleged promise to marry. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the petitioner’s offer to pay 4 lacs to the complainant without prejudice and subject to future adjustment (if any), the petitioner is admitted to bail on furnishing personal bond in the sum of 50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. He shall pay 4 lacs to complainant within two weeks through Investigating Officer by way of Demand Draft.

¶14

The bail application stands disposed of.

¶15

S.P.GARG, J

¶16

APRIL 19, 2016 / tr

¶17

page 2 of 2

¶18

BAIL APPLN. 566/2016

Krishna Kumar Sharma v. State (Nct of Delhi)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Krishna Kumar Sharma v. State (Nct of Delhi)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shaiyara Vs the State

Narender Kumar Ahlawat Vs State

Sanjay Kumar Jha Vs State

Ravi Kapoor Vs State

Waseem Akram Saifi @ Waseem Vs the State ( Gnct of Delhi)

Geeta Chawla Vs State NCT of Delhi