Manoj v. the State (G.N.C.T. of Delhi)
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~11
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- BAIL APPLN. 441/2016 MANOJ ..... Petitioner Through Mr R.P. Bhardwaj, Advocate
versus
THE STATE (G.N.C.T. OF DELHI)
..... Respondent Through Mr Akshai Malik, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State along with Sub Inspector Mehrab Alam, PS Khajuri Khas.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA
O R D E R % 30.03.2016
This is an application under Section 438 Cr.PC moved by the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail.
As per the status report, the petitioner has already been arrested. As such, this application has become infructuous. Accordingly, the petitioner seeks to withdraw the same.
The bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Manoj
- respondent
The State (G.N.C.T. of Delhi)
Coram
Sunita Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court