Prem v. the State
Case brief
What is this about?
An order granting anticipatory bail in FIR No. 24/16 alleging hurt and voluntarily causing grievous hurt. The court allowed the applications after noting the applicants' cooperation and lack of need for custodial interrogation, permitting release on bail with bonds.
What did the court decide?
Applicants granted anticipatory bail; release on personal bonds with one surety each in Rs. 10,000/-; restrain from contacting victim or witnesses.
What the court decided
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AM UL YA
Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI
ORDER
%
02.08.2016
The applicants have preferred the present applications under Section 438 Cr.P.C. to grant anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in case FIR No. 24/16 under Sections 323/325/341/308/34 IPG registered at police station Hauz Quazi.
Learned counsel for the applicants submits that initially, the FIR was registered under Section 323/341/34 IPG and the applicants were granted bail. However, subsequently, Sections 325 and 308 IPG were added since the injury was found to be grievous. Learned counsel submits that the applicants have already been called for interrogation on several occasions and they have joined the investigation. Even this Gourt had granted protection to the applicants on 30.05.2016 and they had joined the investigation even after this. He submits that no recovery is required to be made at the instance of the applicants.
Learned APP submits that the investigation is complete and the final report has not been filed on account of the pendency of the present applications. Since the investigation is stated to be complete and the applicants have already joined investigation, there is no need for custodial interrogation of the applicants.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present anticipatory bail applications should be allowed given the FIR's allegations and the investigation status.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
The applicants
Coram
VIPIN SANGHI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court