The petitioner, Wipro Limited, written an application noting that the respondent had appointed a nominee arbitrator. No further orders were required as the matter was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
WIPRO LIMITED ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr Rajat Joneja, Advocate.
versus
EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr Saurabh Chadda, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R
% 18.11.2016
IA No.14224/2016
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
ARB.P. 717/2016
The learned counsel for the petitioner states that after the present petition was filed the respondent has appointed Justice Mukul Mudgal (Retd.), former Chief Justice of Punjab and Haryana High Court as its nominee Arbitrator.
In this view, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition. The petition is disposed of.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
NOVEMBER 18, 2016 MK
Wipro Limited
Employees State Insurance Corporation
Vibhu Bakru
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
