Petitioner withdrew an arbitration petition after the respondent appointed an arbitrator and parties agreed to a nine-month timeline for adjudication; the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
..... Petitioner
Through : Mr M C Kochar, Adv with Petitioner. versus
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF SUPPLIES & DISPOSAL & ORS.
..... Respondents Through : Mr Bhagwan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr Priti, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
The learned counsel for the Respondent states that the Respondent has already appointed Mr Anil Kumar, IG (Prov), Headquarters DG, BSF, as an Arbitrator for adjudication of the disputes raised by the Petitioner.
Learned counsels for parties have agreed that the Arbitrator shall conclude the adjudication of the disputes within a period of nine months from today.
In view of same, learned counsel for the Petitioner prays to withdraw the instant petition.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
JULY 18, 2016 M
SHIV KUMAR SHARMA
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF SUPPLIES & DISPOSAL
VIBHU BAKHRU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
