The petitioner sought to withdraw a writ petition due to clerical errors in the Khasra number. The Court allowed the withdrawal with liberty to file a fresh petition.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition with corrected information.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~40
ESS JEE ENTERPRISES ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr V.K. Shailendra, Adv. with Ms Worthing Kasar, Adv.
versus
GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr Yeeshu Jain, Adv. with Ms Jyoti Tyagi, Adv. for LAC/L&B
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR O R D E R % 06.12.2016
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that some errors have been crept in the writ petition particularly in the description of the Khasra number and therefore she has instructions to withdraw this petition with the liberty to file a fresh petition with the corrected information.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J
ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J
DECEMBER 06, 2016/ab
Ess Jee Enterprises
Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi & Ors.
Badar Durrez Ahmed
Ashutosh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
