Disposed

Col a P S Hansi v. Union of India and Ors.

Delhi HC16 May 2016W.P.(C)/9634/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order addressed multiple writ petitions regarding allotment of accommodations to government employees. The court directed petitioners to shift to allotted accommodations by 15.06.2016, noting that NAC delays would not bar acceptance of offers.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners directed to shift to allotted accommodations by 15.06.2016; market rent applicable for delay; NACs to be issued within three weeks.

Col a P S Hansi Vs Union of India and Ors. — Service and Employment | Delhi HC (2016)

¶1

$~6 to 10, 12 and 13.

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(C) 8436/2015 and CM APPL.18076/2015 SARVJIT SINGH SLARIA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. S.S. Pandey, Advocate with Mr. H.S. Tiwari, Advocate

¶4

versus

¶5

UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC with Mr. Vinod Kumar Tiwari, Advocate and Mr. Vihag Snehal, SAO/QTR.

¶6

- W.P.(C) 8441/2015 and CM APPL. 18084/2015 RAJEEV SHARMA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. S.S. Pandey, Advocate with Mr. H.S. Tiwari, Advocate

¶7

versus

¶8

UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC with Mr. Vinod Kumar Tiwari, Advocate and Mr. Vihag Snehal, SAO/QTR.

¶9

- W.P.(C) 8442/2015 and 18085/2015 RAM KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. S.S. Pandey, Advocate with Mr. H.S. Tiwari, Advocate

¶10

versus

¶11

UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC with Mr. Vinod Kumar Tiwari, Advocate and Mr. Vihag Snehal, SAO/QTR.

¶12

WP(C) 8436/2015 and connected matters Page 1 of 4

¶13

W.P.(C) 8444/2015 and CM APPL. 18088/2015 COL NAVNEET SRIVASTAVA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. S.S. Pandey, Advocate with Mr. H.S. Tiwari, Advocate

¶14

versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC with Mr. Vinod Kumar Tiwari, Advocate and Mr. Vihag Snehal, SAO/QTR.

¶15

- W.P.(C) 8477/2015 and CM APPL. 18191/2015 ADIT SAXENA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. S.S. Pandey, Advocate with Mr. H.S. Tiwari, Advocate

¶16

versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC with Mr. Vinod Kumar Tiwari, Advocate and Mr. Vihag Snehal, SAO/QTR.

¶17

- W.P.(C) 9046/2015 and CM APPL. 20459/2015

¶18

LT CL J S RAWAT ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. S.S. Pandey, Advocate with Mr. H.S. Tiwari, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC

¶19

WP(C) 8436/2015 and connected matters Page 2 of 4

¶20

W.P.(C) 9634/2015 and CM APPL. 22848/2015 COL A P S HANSI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. S.S. Pandey, Advocate with Mr. H.S. Tiwari, Advocate

¶21

versus

¶22

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vivekanand Mishra, Senior Panel Counsel, UOI.

¶23

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR

¶24

O R D E R % 16.05.2016

¶25

Pursuant to the order dated 31.03.2016, counsels for the respondents state on instructions that offers for accommodations have been made to the petitioners in the present batch of matters but none of them have reverted back with the requisite NACs.

¶26

Counsel for the petitioners explains that when the petitioners had approached the Station Headquarters for obtaining NACs, certain queries had been raised and information sought, which was duly furnished by them in the second week of April, 2016, but even thereafter, the NACs have not been received by them due to which the petitioners could not respond to the offers of allotment made by the CAO.

¶27

Counsels for the respondents state on instructions that the NACs shall be issued to the petitioners within three weeks and if further requirements are to be fulfilled by them, the same shall be duly intimated to them within one week from today, so that they can do the needful and revert back to the respondents for obtaining the requisite NACs.

¶28

We are informed that the petitioners are ordinarily granted two

¶29

WP(C) 8436/2015 and connected matters Page 3 of 4

¶30

months’ time to furnish the NACs. Therefore the NACs can be furnished even after the petitioners shift to their new accommodations. Counsels for the respondents assure us that in any case, NACs shall be issued to the petitioners within three weeks from today. Therefore, furnishing of NACs does not appear to be an impediment for accepting offers of accommodations made available by the respondents.

¶31

It has been enquired from the counsel for the petitioners as to whether the petitioners are ready and willing to accept the offers made by the respondents for allotment of accommodations, to which the reply is in the affirmative. He submits that the petitioners are ready and willing to accept the accommodations offered to them and they shall shift by 15.06.2016. 6. The petitioners are directed to shift to the accommodations allotted to them by the respondents on or before 15.06.2016. If they do not do so within the stipulated timeline, then market rent shall be leviable thereafter in respect of the accommodations under their occupation.

¶32

The petitions are disposed of alongwith the pending applications. No

¶33

orders as to costs.

¶34

DASTI to the counsels for the respondents for compliance.

¶35

HIMA KOHLI, J

¶36

SUNIL GAUR, J

¶37

MAY 16, 2016 rkb/mk

¶38

WP(C) 8436/2015 and connected matters Page 4 of 4

Col a P S Hansi v. Union of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Col a P S Hansi v. Union of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

U.P. Singh Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Sewa International Fashion Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs Rajender Chauhan & Ors.

Hafiz Mohd Khalid Vs the Union of India & Ors.

Amar Singh & Ors. Vs Union of India & Ors.

Jagdev Singh Vs Tehsildar / Consolidation Officer & Ors.

Central Council of Indian Medicine and Anr. Vs Prem Raj Sharma and Anr.

Prakash Aggarwal Vs Cit,Central Circle -I New Delh

Ajay Gautam Vs State of Delhi & Anr.

Satish Vs Union of India & Ors.

Vicky Vs Union of India and Ors.

Umesh Ray Vs Union of India & Ors.

Deepak Vohra Vs Union of India & Ors.

Lt. Col Ar Harish & Anr. Vs Union of India & Ors.

Lt Col Amit Chatterjee Vs Union of India and Ors.