Writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel. Exemption order was passed subject to exceptions.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn. Exemption allowed subject to exceptions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~20
BALBIR SINGH AND ANR ..... Petitioners
Through : Mr A.Maitri, Advocate.
versus
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through : Mr Mukesh Gupta, Advocate for SDMC.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
O R D E R % 04.02.2016 CM No.4017/2016 (exemption)
Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
W.P.(C) 919/2016 & CM No.4016/2016 (stay)
Mr Maitri, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, states that he has instructions to withdraw this writ petition.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
FEBRUARY 04, 2016 ‘sn’
Balbir Singh and Another
South Delhi Municipal Corporation
Badar Durrez Ahmed
Sanjeev Sachdeva
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
