The petitioner withdrew the writ petition regarding a cancelled tender after respondents informed the court. The High Court dismissed the petition as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~10
M/S EVEREST HUMAN RESOURCE CONSULTANTS ..... Petitioner Through : Mr Khalid Akhtar with Mr Abhay Kumar
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through : Mr Sanjeev Narula with Mr Ajay Kalra
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
O R D E R
%
02.02.2016
The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents states that the subject
tender has been cancelled.
In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the respondents, the
learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has instructions to not press this petition any further.
The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed in the circumstances above.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
FEBRUARY 02, 2016 SR
M/S Everest Human Resource Consultants
Union of India
Badar Durrez Ahmed
Sanjeev Sachdeva
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
