This is a miscellaneous application seeking correction of three typographical errors in the judgment dated 05.08.2016 in the same writ petition. The Court ordered the corrections to be carried out.
Three typographical errors in the judgment dated 05.08.2016 were ordered to be corrected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~SB
Through Mr. A.K. Behera, Advocate
versus
UOI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSC with Ms. Aneeta Goyal and Mr.Prabhakar Srivastav, Advocates for UOI.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL
O R D E R % 16.09.2016 CM.APPL 33345/2016 in W.P.(C) 8653/2010
This application has been filed by the petitioner seeking correction of three typographical errors in the judgment dated 05.08.2016. Firstly, at page 1 of the judgment, the application number shall be read as CM.APPL 22005/2010 and not 22005/2015, secondly, in para 34 of the judgment in the third line, the word ‘cannot’ shall be read as ‘can’ and, thirdly, at the last page of the judgment in the first line, ‘DRAT’ shall be read as ‘DRT’. The counsel for the respondent has no objection to the same. The three corrections shall be carried out accordingly.
The application is allowed.
G.S.SISTANI, J
SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J
SEPTEMBER 16, 2016 pst /
Vijay Kumar Verma
UOI and Ors.
G.S. Sistani
Sangita Dhingra Sehgal
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
