The petition was dismissed in default as neither party appeared after proper calling. Counsel for respondents were present but the petitioner was absent.
Petition dismissed in default and for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
NARENDER REDDY ..... Petitioner Through: Nemo
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anil Soni, CGSC, with Mr. Arvind Sharma, DC, BSF for respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
%
O R D E R 16.02.2016
Page 1 of 2
W.P.(C) 855/2016
and the matter was passed over to await the presence of learned counsel for the petitioner.
HIMA KOHLI, J
SUNIL GAUR, J
FEBRUARY 16, 2016
s
Page 2 of 2
W.P.(C) 855/2016
NARENDER REDDY
UNION OF INDIA & ORS
HIMA KOHLI
SUNIL GAUR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
