Petitioner sought leave to withdraw writ petition. Bench granted leave and dismissed the petition as withdrawn. No substantive legal proposition established.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~165
SHRUTI SHARMA ..... Petitioner
Through : Dr. Rakesh Gosain, Advocate.
versus
COLLEGE OF ART AND ANR ..... Respondents Through : Mr Siddharth Dutta, Advocate for R-1. Mr Mayank Yadav, Advocate for R-2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R % 05.10.2016 W.P.(C) 8480/2016 & CM No.34949/2016(stay)
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for leave to withdraw the petition.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
OCTOBER 05, 2016 ‘sn’
Shruti Sharma
College of Art
Sanjeev Sachdeva
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
