The High Court of Delhi granted the petitioner permission to withdraw a writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petitioner granted leave and liberty to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition with better particulars.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~28.
ASHWINI KUMAR UPADHYAY ..... Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person.
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Manish Mohan, CGSC with Mr.Shivam Chanan, Ms.Manisha Saroha, Ms.Priyansha Sinha, Advs. for UOI.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL
O R D E R % 19.09.2016
The petitioner who is appearing in person seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition with better particulars.
Accordingly, granting leave and liberty, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
CHIEF JUSTICE
SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J
SEPTEMBER 19, 2016 ‘anb’
Ashwin Kumar Upadhyay
Union of India
Sangita Dhingra Sehgal
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
