In a single-paragraph order, the Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition (W.P.(C) 7924/2016) after the petitioner sought leave to withdraw the proceedings. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~ 35
MASTER PRITHVI RAJ CHAUHAN ..... Petitioner
Through : Mr Nishant Sharma and Mr Rahul Bakshi, Advocates.
versus
TAEKWONDO FEDERATION OF INDIA & ORS..... Respondents Through : None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R % 16.09.2016
W.P.(C) 7924/2016 & CM No.32843/2016(stay)
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for leave to withdraw the petition.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
SEPTEMBER 16, 2016 ‘sn’
Master Prithvi Raj Chauhan
Taekwondo Federation of India
Sanjeev Sachdeva
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
