This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~90
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through : Mr Amit Bansal, Ms Manisha Singh and Ms Seema Dolo, Advocates for R-3/CBSE. Mr Arun Bhardwaj, Mr Sriram and Mr Mimansak Bhardwaj, Advocates for Union of India.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R
% 08.09.2016 CM No.32807/2016(exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
W.P.(C) 7919/2016 & CM No.32806/2016(stay)
The original records of the petitioner have been produced. The same have been perused by the petitioner as well as by the counsel.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not wish to press the present petition.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
SEPTEMBER 08, 2016 ‘sn’
Shagun Sharma
Union of India
Sanjeev Sachdeva
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
