The petitioner sought liberty to withdraw the Writ Petition, which was granted. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn on 05.09.2016 by a single-line order.
Liberty to withdraw the petition was granted. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~34
Through:Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through:Mr. Vijay Joshi and Mr. Sushil Kumar Pandey, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO O R D E R
% 05.09.2016
After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw the petition.
Liberty granted.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
INDIRA BANERJEE, J
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
SEPTEMBER 05, 2016 /RS
AVDESH PAL
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
INDIRA BANERJEE
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
