The High Court of Delhi allowed a writ petition challenging the delay in making a supplementary award decided over 12 years ago. The Court directed the Respondent to make the award within six weeks.
Direction to the Respondent to make the supplementary award within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~40
JAI SINGH RANA & ANR ..... Petitioners
Through Mr Rajiv Kr. Ghawana, Adv.
versus
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr Dhanesh Relan, St. Counsel for DDA with Ms Isha Garg, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR O R D E R % 19.07.2016
In this petition, the only issue is with regard to the making of the supplementary award. The award itself was made as far back as on 20.10.2004 in which it was mentioned that the supplementary award would be made. Over 12 years have gone by and the supplementary award has not yet been made.
We are disposing of this petition with the direction that the supplementary award be made in accordance with law within six weeks from today, if not already made. The writ petition is allowed accordingly.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J
ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J
JULY 19, 2016/ab
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should direct the Respondent to make the supplementary award within six weeks.
Whether the writ petition regarding the delayed supplementary award be allowed with a direction.
JAI SINGH RANA & ANR
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS
BADAR DURREZ AHMED
ASHUTOSH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
