The petitioners sought to withdraw a writ petition due to a settlement. The court dismissed the pending petitions and applications as withdrawn and vacated the interim order.
Writ petition and related applications dismissed as withdrawn; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~16
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
JASWINDER SINGH TONDON & ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. B.P. Agarwal and Mr. Sunil Gupta, Advocates
versus
TATA POWER DELHI DISTRIBUTION LTD. & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Arav Kapoor, Advocate for respondent No.1
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
O R D E R
% 19.02.2016
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition in view of the settlement with respondent No.2
The writ petition and the pending applications are dismissed as withdrawn.
Interim order stands vacated.
J.R. MIDHA, J.
FEBRUARY 19, 2016 rsk
JASWINDER SINGH TONDON & ANR
TATA POWER DELHI DISTRIBUTION LTD. & ANR
J.R. MIDHA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
